General Tech
Business Insiderabout 2 hours ago
0

Top economist Steve Hanke told us why he doubts AI will be the job destroyer many expect

AI

Economist Steve Hanke argues AI's high resource costs will prevent it from destroying jobs as feared, predicting businesses will stick with cheaper human labor.

Top economist Steve Hanke told us why he doubts AI will be the job destroyer many expect

Intelligence Insights

Context + impact, normalized for TechCulture.

The Big Picture
Steve Hanke, a Johns Hopkins economist, told Business Insider that AI is unlikely to be the job destroyer many expect due to its enormous costs in water, power, and microchips. He dismissed the idea of AI being virtually free as 'delusional and dumb,' noting that unlike software, AI provision requires ongoing resource expenditure. Hanke pointed to Big Tech's projected $700 billion in capital expenditures this year as evidence of AI's expense, and argued that in many cases, employing humans will remain cheaper than AI. He criticized AI visionaries as 'charlatans and hucksters' and predicted that resource scarcity will limit the AI revolution. While optimists like Elon Musk foresee AI-driven abundance, Hanke's skepticism aligns with recent warnings from investors like Mark Cuban and Michael Burry about the fragility of AI spending.
Why It Matters
Hanke's critique challenges the prevailing narrative that AI will inevitably lead to mass job displacement, suggesting that the high costs of AI infrastructure—water, power, and chips—may make human labor more economical for many businesses. This perspective could temper investor enthusiasm and policy responses, as the projected $1 trillion in Big Tech spending by 2027 may not yield the expected returns if AI adoption is constrained by resource scarcity. The debate underscores a critical tension: while AI's potential is vast, its real-world impact will be shaped by economic and environmental limits, not just technological capability.

Deepen your understanding

Use our AI to break down complex signals.

Select an AI action to generate more depth.

Steve Hanke
Steve Hanke
Steve Hanke says AI costs too much to be a major threat to jobs.

Steve Hanke

  • Steve Hanke says AI won't be the game changer many people imagine as it's "incredibly costly."
  • The leading economist said the water, power, and microchips needed to power AI limit its potential.
  • Hanke said that many companies won't replace people with AI because human labor will be cheaper.

The idea that artificial intelligence will be free to use and virtually costless to provide is delusional and dumb, Steve Hanke says.

"This belief is based on a disconnect from reality, as well as a good dose of idiotic economic reasoning," the professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University told Business Insider by email.

"AI is incredibly costly; it is very resource intensive," Hanke continued. "It requires huge amounts of water, power, and physical capital" like graphics chips, he added.

Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta have projected roughly $700 billion in combined capital expenditures this year, and $1 trillion in 2027, as they race to build out the data centers needed to power the next generation of AI models.

Hanke, who served on President Reagan's Council of Economic Advisers, also addressed widespread concerns that AI will cause massive job destruction.

"Businesses will not be firing everybody and replacing them with AI," he said, because in many cases that will be a lot more expensive than employing humans.

The veteran economist took aim at AI visionaries, describing many of them as "charlatans and hucksters." He said they're "comparing apples and oranges" when they liken AI to software, as providing AI to customers costs money whereas software, once developed, can be sold countless times at virtually no additional cost.

Hanke predicted the "cost of scarce resources that are gobbled up by AI will decide how far the 'AI revolution' goes."

AI optimists have countered that technological advances will make microchips and data centers more power-efficient over time, bringing down the cost of AI.

Elon Musk has made waves for predicting that AI will supercharge productivity and drive down production costs, ushering in an era of abundance where "anyone can have whatever stuff they want."

The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has recommended people stop saving for retirement in 10 or 20 years as "money won't matter." Personal finance and AI experts previously told Business Insider they resoundingly disagreed with Musk's advice.

Musk has predicted AI will take over most jobs, and the "best way" for governments to deal with the resulting unemployment is to provide a "universal high income" by mailing checks to everyone.

Mounting concerns about AI

Hanke has been skeptical of AI for a while, describing it to Business Insider in February as "overhyped and potentially dangerous."

Last fall, Hanke said the AI boom could falter if Big Tech companies failed to hit their numbers, and said it "might be wise to buckle your seat belt."

Mark Cuban, the former "Shark Tank" investor, and Michael Burry of "The Big Short" fame warned this week about the massive scale of AI spending and Nvidia's key role in financing it, underlining Hanke's concern about how much the technology costs.

Cuban said it was "truly scary" how central Nvidia is to the AI boom, and cautioned it "all could crumble" if the chipmaker gets outcompeted or makes a mistake.

Burry said Nvidia was "overreaching" in its campaign to strike deals with customers to support its chip sales, and its efforts threatened to "push the circular spending to biblical proportions."

Read the original article on Business Insider
Hardware Big Tech AI Policy Economics

Intelligence Exchange

0

Log in to participate in the exchange.

Sign In

Syncing Discussions...

Finding Related Intelligence...
Top economist Steve Hanke told us why he doubts AI will be the job destroyer many expect | TechCulture