AI & Machine Learning
Business Insiderabout 18 hours ago
0

An AI strategist fired half her AI agents after becoming a 'botsitter'

AI

AI strategist Sol Rashidi fired half her AI agents because they required constant supervision, creating more work than they saved. She replaced them with human virtual assistants, highlighting the 'botsitting' phenomenon where workers spend hours correcting AI errors.

An AI strategist fired half her AI agents after becoming a 'botsitter'

Intelligence Insights

Context + impact, normalized for TechCulture.

The Big Picture
Sol Rashidi, chief strategy officer at Cyera and a Harvard Kennedy School senior fellow, fired two of her four AI agents after finding them unreliable and time-consuming. She described spending more time 'babysitting' the agents—feeding context, debugging mistakes, and cleaning up errors—than doing productive work. This experience aligns with a Glean report that found white-collar workers spend an average of 6.4 hours per week on 'botsitting,' contributing to a productivity paradox where AI gains are offset by oversight costs. Rashidi replaced the agents with human virtual assistants and cautioned against automating for automation's sake, urging leaders to apply judgment rather than pursuing AI at all costs.
Why It Matters
The article highlights a growing 'productivity paradox' where AI agents, intended to save time, instead create 'botsitting' work that consumes hours of human oversight. This suggests that without careful deployment, AI can undermine its own efficiency gains, forcing companies to reconsider whether automation is always worth the cost.

Deepen your understanding

Use our AI to break down complex signals.

Select an AI action to generate more depth.

worker working with monitors
worker working with monitors
"I don't have the time to babysit agents and keep course correcting the context," AI strategist Sol Rashidi said.

Bevan Goldswain/Getty Images

  • An AI strategist pulled back from using AI agents after they created more work than they saved.
  • Sol Rashidi said "botsitting" unreliable AI agents consumed hours better spent on higher-value work.
  • She replaced them with human virtual assistants to handle some of the work.

AI agents are supposed to eliminate busywork. For AI strategist Sol Rashidi, it ended up creating more work instead.

"I just fired half my agents because they were unreliable," Rashidi, chief strategy officer at data security firm Cyera and a senior fellow at Harvard Kennedy School, told Business Insider.

Rather than freeing up her time, she said the agents — virtual assistants designed to complete tasks autonomously — demanded constant supervision.

"I was spending more time babysitting them" than doing useful work, she said. Rashidi had four agents running at one time and got rid of two.

She is one of a growing number of what a recent Glean report called "botsitters" — workers who spend hours each week feeding AI context, debugging mistakes, and cleaning up errors.

The report found white-collar workers spend an average of 6.4 hours a week on that often-overlooked work, nearly a full working day over the course of a week.

While many companies, including Microsoft, are still figuring out how their AI agents will work with their human employees, several solo entrepreneurs are running their businesses, in part with AI agents.

Still, for Rashidi, deploying AI agents in real-world work proved far messier than the hype suggests.

"I think that the hardest part is the over-glamorizing of bots, agents," she said. "Yes, it's amazing, but there's a place and time for everything. And we've lost the ability to discern that place and time."

'I don't have the time to babysit agents'

The problem Rashidi described fits into a broader "productivity paradox" that some companies are facing.

As part of "The Great Coding Reset" series, Business Insider's Juliana Kaplan and Jacob Zinkula reported that while AI is helping many employees complete tasks faster, those gains aren't consistently translating into better company performance.

The Glean report said that much of this missing productivity may be getting eaten up by botsitting.

That tracks with Rashidi's experience.

Rather than continuing to manage agents, Rashidi told Business Insider she hired human virtual assistants to handle some of the work instead.

"I don't have the time to babysit agents and keep course correcting the context," she said.

The lesson for her is that leaders shouldn't automate for the sake of automation.

"Individuals are going to have to apply judgment and critical thinking," she said. "And leaders are going to have to get past the narrative of 'we must do AI at all costs' because sometimes the cost is higher than the reward."

Read the original article on Business Insider
Startups Big Tech AI Productivity Workplace

Intelligence Exchange

0

Log in to participate in the exchange.

Sign In

Syncing Discussions...

Finding Related Intelligence...